Lilly Kauffman, Edmund M Weisberg, Elliot K Fishman
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol . 2023 Feb 1;S0363-0188(23)00004-X. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.01.007. Online ahead of print.
Objective: To create our own survey to identify the most recent ways in which the global radiology community is using social media specifically for radiology education.
Materials and methods: We created a 30-question survey on SurveyMonkey, promoted it on our CTisus Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn, as well as Reddit accounts, and to our newsletter subscribers, sharing it from March 15 to April 5, 2022. The survey requested demographic information, and asked respondents to clarify their role in radiology and how they participated in each social media platform for radiology education.
Results: We received 254 responses, of which 253 specified their role in radiology: 40.71% were radiologists (n = 103); 24.90% were radiologic technologists (n = 63); 17.79% were residents in radiology (n = 45); and 16.60% engaged in other radiology professions (n = 42). In total, 65 countries were represented (n = 250). Individuals aged 25-34 (n = 89) represented the most popular age group, followed by those aged 35-44 (n = 47), then 45-54 (n = 36). As a combined group, 80.71% said they use social media "every day" or "a few times a week" (n = 205). YouTube was the most popular social media platform for radiology education (n = 180), followed by Instagram (n = 156) and Facebook (n = 110). In terms of goals for radiology education on social media, most answered "to learn more in radiology" (n = 217), with "to keep myself updated on current events in radiology" (n = 162), and "to participate in radiology discussions with colleagues" (n = 67) also well represented. Almost 3 quarters of respondents felt that social media was "extremely useful" or "very useful" for radiology education (n = 187). Approximately half of respondents said they "learn much more from social media" or "learn a bit more from social media" over traditional resources such as textbooks and medical journals (n = 126).
Conclusion: Our results suggest that the global radiology community finds education via social media to be useful, and often partakes in such education. It also highlights which social media are relevant for current radiology education and which are not. We anticipate returning to this survey approximately every 2 years to examine how the landscape of social media continues to change in the world of radiology education.