• ACR Appropriateness Criteria Staging and Follow-Up of Ovarian Cancer: 2025 Update

    Expert Panel on GYN and OB Imaging; Erica B Stein, Aradhana M Venkatesan, Esma A Akin, Emily Barrows, Parul Barry, Nicole M Hindman, Chenchan Huang, Gaiane M Rauch, Madeleine Sertic, Krista Suarez-Weiss, Jason D Wright, Ashish P Wasnik
    J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 Nov;22(11S):S689-S698. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.08.033.

    Abstract

    Ovarian cancer remains the sixth most common cause of cancer mortality in women in the United States and is a leading cause of mortality among patients with gynecologic malignancies. Imaging plays an important role in pretreatment staging of epithelial ovarian cancers, the evaluation of posttreatment response, and follow-up. Accurate pretreatment imaging is integral to determine appropriate first-line therapy. By delineating the extent of disease, imaging can assist decision making regarding the likelihood of optimal primary cytoreduction or need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy when optimal cytoreduction is not felt to be achievable. Contrast-enhanced CT serves as a mainstay modality for the pretreatment assessment of ovarian cancer, with MRI, PET/CT, and, in some instances, PET/MRI used in the pretreatment setting. CT and PET/CT are also integral to assessing response, including in the suspected recurrence setting, with MRI and PET/MRI being used in select cases. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.