Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, Imaging 2, Level 1, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Rd, Middlesex, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
The purpose of this article is to assess the effect of observers on combined metabolic-vascular parameters in colorectal cancer.
Twenty-five prospective patients (12 men and 13 women; mean age, 66.9 years) with proven primary colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent integrated (18)F-FDG PET/perfusion CT to assess tumor metabolism (mean and maximum standardized uptake value [SUV(mean) and SUV(max), respectively]) and vascularization (blood flow [BF], blood volume [BV], permeability surface-area product, and standardized perfusion value). Intra- and interobserver agreement for PET, perfusion CT, and combined metabolic-flow parameters were determined by Bland-Altman statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
The mean tumor size was 3.8 ± 1.6 cm; there were five stage IA/B, six stage IIA/B, eight stage IIIA/B, and six stage IV tumors. Intra- and interobserver agreement for individual parameters was fair to good, with mean differences between observers of -0.74 for SUV(max), -0.16 for SUV(mean), 9.72 for BF, 0.15 for BV, -0.76 for permeability surface-area product, and 0.09 for standardized perfusion value. ICCs were 0.44-0.99 and 0.38-0.89 for intra- and interobserver agreement, respectively. Interobserver agreement was variable for combined metabolic-flow parameters but better for metabolic-flow difference than for metabolic-flow ratio: ICCs were 0.69-0.88 for the metabolic-flow difference and 0.44-0.94 for the metabolic-flow ratio.
Combined parameters to assess the metabolic-flow relationship are influenced by observer variation. Intra- and interobserver agreement are better for the metabolic-flow differences than for the ratios, suggesting that metabolic-flow differences may be a more robust parameter for clinical practice.