Radiology 2003; 226:53-62.
Liem YS, Kock MC, Ijzermans JN, Weimar W, Visser K, Hunink MG.
PURPOSE: To determine the most cost-effective strategy for preoperative imaging performed in potential living renal donors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a decision-analytic model, the societal cost-effectiveness of digital subtraction angiography (DSA), gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, contrast material-enhanced spiral computed tomographic (CT) angiography, and combinations of these imaging techniques was evaluated. Outcome measures included lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. A base-case analysis was performed with a 40-year-old female donor and a 40-year-old female recipient.
RESULTS: For the donor, MR angiography (24.05 QALYs and $9,000) dominated all strategies except for MR angiography with CT angiography, which had an incremental ratio of $245,000 per QALY. For the recipient, DSA and DSA with MR angiography yielded similar results (10.46 QALYs and $179,000) and dominated all other strategies. When results for donor and recipient were combined, DSA dominated all other strategies (34.51 QALYs and $188,000). If DSA was associated with a 99% specificity or less for detection of renal disease, MR angiography with CT angiography was superior (34.47 QALYs and $190,000).
CONCLUSION: For preoperative imaging in a potential renal donor, DSA is the most cost-effective strategy if it has a specificity greater than 99% for detection of renal disease; otherwise, MR angiography with CT angiography is the most cost-effective strategy.