• Assessment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Using MDCT After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Comparison with MRI

    Loic Boussel, Michael Ribagnac, Eric Bonnefoy, Patrick Staat, Brett M. Elicker, Didier Revel, Philippe Douek

    OBJECTIVE. Imaging to determine myocardial infarct size is difficult in the emergency setting because the current gold standards, MRI and nuclear medicine techniques, are diffi-cult to perform in unstable patients. Delayed enhanced MDCT has recently been proposed as a technique to study contrast uptake in infarcted myocardium. In this study, we compared the extent of acute myocardial infarction as measured by delayed enhanced MDCT performed immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without an additional iodine in-jection with that measured by delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen consecutive patients presenting with primary acute myocardial infarction underwent delayed enhanced MDCT immediately after coronary angioplasty and underwent delayed enhanced MRI within 8 days of angioplasty. Only pa-tients with a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score of 0 or 1 of the culprit coro-nary artery before endovascular angioplasty and TIMI score of 2 or 3 after angioplasty were selected. Comparison of delayed enhanced MDCT and delayed enhanced MRI was performed by three observers and focused on identifying the involved segments and determining the transmural extent of enhancement and infarct size.

    RESULTS. The mean signal intensity was significantly higher in the involved territory than in healthy myocardium: 197 � 81 H versus 71 � 20 H, respectively (p

    CONCLUSION. The results of our study show that delayed enhanced MDCT allows accurate visualization of early myocardial contrast uptake compared with delayed enhanced MRI and does not require an additional contrast injection after PCI.