AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Feb;206(2):348-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15204.
Pansini M1, Morsbach F2, Schubert T1, Hohmann J1, Kovács B1, Szucs-Farkas Z3, Schindera ST1.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to investigate the magnitude of dose optimization for a manufacturer-recommended urolithiasis protocol in a second-generation dual-source CT scanner.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Custom renal phantoms with 24 stones were scanned using the manufacturer-provided dual-energy CT protocol (tube A, 100 kVp and 210 reference mAs; tube B, 140 kVp and 162 reference mAs) and seven dose-optimized protocols in which the reference tube current-time product setting of tube A was reduced stepwise by 20 mAs. Detection and characterization of the stones was assessed. In the patient study, 25 patients underwent the manufacturer-provided dual-energy protocol and 25 patients underwent imaging with a dose-optimized protocol (tube A, 100 kVp and 90 reference mAs; tube B, 140 kVp and 70 reference mAs). Dose-length product (DLP), image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed. Subjective image quality was analyzed by three independent radiologists.
RESULTS: In the phantom study, the reference tube current-time product of tube A could be reduced from 210 to 90 mAs without losing the accuracy of detection or characterization of the calculi. In the patient study, the dose-optimized protocol resulted in a significant reduction of the average DLP by 51% compared with the standard protocol (219.4 vs 443.5 mGy·cm, respectively; p = 0.0001). The image noise was higher, and the CNR was lower, in the dose-optimized group than in the standard-dose group (p < 0.05). The subjective overall image quality of the dose-optimized CT examinations was rated as good, and that of the standard-dose CT examinations was rated as excellent (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The in vitro and in vivo assessment revealed a potential for a 51% dose reduction of the manufacturer-recommended dual-energy CT protocol for urolithiasis without compromising the accuracy.